IMPROVEMENT OF CONTOUR BLASTING TECHNOLOGY IN TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION AND MINING EXCAVATION: MODERN APPROACHES AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31649/2311-1429-2025-2-70-76

Keywords:

contour blasting, tunnels, construction, underground mining, drilling and blasting, drilling rig, optimization of blast parameters

Abstract

The article examines the comprehensive features of contour blasting technology in tunnel construction and excavation works during underground mining development operations. The main disadvantages of conventional blasting methods are analyzed in detail, including excessive disruption of rock mass integrity, formation of extensive fractured zones around excavations, significantly increased support costs, reduced structural stability, and compromised work safety conditions. The substantial advantages of contour methods are highlighted, including effectively minimizing rock contour damage, dramatically improved excavation surface quality, reduced overbreak volumes, substantial savings in support materials, enhanced excavation precision, and improved overall project economics. A comprehensive mathematical model is presented for calculating optimal spacing between blast holes, considering explosive properties, dynamic characteristics of rocks being excavated, geomechanical parameters of the rock mass, stress distribution patterns, and local geological conditions. Modern contour blasting methods are thoroughly analyzed, including pre-splitting techniques, smooth blasting procedures, controlled blasting approaches, and their various combined variants tailored to specific geological formations. Key technological parameters are systematically determined: optimal borehole diameter, precise charge spacing calculations, appropriate linear charge mass distribution, suitable explosive type selection, advanced initiation system design, timing sequence optimization, and burden-to-spacing ratios. Detailed practical recommendations are provided for applying contour blasting methods under various challenging geological conditions, including hard crystalline rock formations, medium-strength sedimentary rocks, fractured rock masses, and weak soil conditions. Quality control issues and comprehensive effectiveness evaluation of contour blasting methods in complex underground conditions are thoroughly considered. The research addresses systematic optimization of blasting parameters through extensive field testing, continuous monitoring of excavation quality indicators, vibration control measures, and post-blast damage assessment protocols. Special attention is given to advanced safety measures, environmental impact considerations, noise control, and dust management when implementing sophisticated contour blasting technologies in underground mining operations and modern tunnel construction projects.

Author Biographies

Andrii Viktorovych Panasiuk, Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Mine Surveying

Andrii Oleksiiovych Kryvoruchko, Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Yuliia Kostiantynivna Prypoten, Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Mining Technologies and Construction named after Prof. Bakka M.T.

References

Zhou, Z., Shi, X., Yang, J., & Luo, Q. (2019). Comparison of presplit and smooth blasting methods for excavation of rock wells. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, Article 3743028. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3743028

Li, S., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., & Chen, X. (2023). Study of presplit blasting under high in-situ stress. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 287, 109360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109360

Zhang, C., Liu, W., & Zhao, H. (2021). Presplit blasting technique in treating hard overlying strata: From numerical simulation to field practice. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, Article 5558538. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5558538

Yang, J., Wu, X., Fu, Q., Hou, S., Song, H., Jin, H., Liu, Y., & Tang, J. (2024). Experimental study on an innovative method for pre-split blasting to protect withdrawal roadways. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 57, РР. 6163–6181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-03844-3

Hu, Y. G., Lu, W. B., Chen, M., Yan, P., & Yang, J. H. (2014). Comparison of blast-induced damage between presplit and smooth blasting of high rock slope. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 47, РР. 1307–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0475-7

Hong, Z. X., Tao, M., Zhao, R., Zhou, J., & Zhao, M. S. (2023). Investigation on overbreak and underbreak of pre-stressed tunnels under the impact of decoupled charge blasting. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 182, 104784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104784

Shi, J., Wang, Y., Yang, Z., Shan, W., & An, H. (2024). Comprehensive review of tunnel blasting evaluation techniques and innovative half porosity assessment using 3D image reconstruction. Applied Sciences, 14 (21), 9791. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219791

Han, H., Fukuda D., Liu H., Salmi E.F, Sellers E., Liu T., Chan A. (2020). Combined finite-discrete element modelling of rock fracture and fragmentation induced by contour blasting during tunnelling with high horizontal in-situ stress. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 127, Article 104214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104214

Zare, M., & Bruland, A. (200). Comparison of tunnel blast design models. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 21, РР. 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.09.001

Pytel, W., Mertuszka, P., Fulawka, K., Szumny, M., & Stolecki, L. (2019). Numerical modeling of rockmass behaviour due to blasting operations in underground mines. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.04815

Downloads

Abstract views: 69

Published

2026-02-05

How to Cite

[1]
A. V. Panasiuk, A. O. Kryvoruchko, and Y. K. Prypoten, “IMPROVEMENT OF CONTOUR BLASTING TECHNOLOGY IN TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION AND MINING EXCAVATION: MODERN APPROACHES AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS”, СучТехнБудів, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 70–76, Feb. 2026.

Issue

Section

CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.